Deforestation and environmentalists have had a huge controversy. Many people think of the benefits of deforestation, but they seem to have passed the negative effects of it. Those who support deforestation can explore the economic benefits of deforestation. Deforestation can bring economic benefits, but the negative impact greatly exceeds positive factors. Deforestation destroys the natural habitat of animals. When a species' natural habitat has disappeared, the species is difficult to adapt - leading to extinction. The end result of deforestation is a significant reduction in biodiversity.
In the article "The Benefits of Deforestation", Nathalie Fiset focuses on the economic benefits of deforestation. She claims that wood products are one of the most stable constructive substances in human society, and that humans cannot be without Fiset. This is true to some extent, but we are evolving into a paperless society. Today, almost everything runs electronically. For example, people can now pay almost any bill online; there are no papers involved. In addition, when people vote, they vote electronically. No more paper votes. When human society learns to live without paper products, there is no reason to cut down so many trees. Most paper companies today use recycled materials instead of trees.
Another point raised by Fiset is that deforestation can create many jobs. She pointed out that when environmentalists oppose deforestation, it can cause many people who use wood products to lose these jobs [Fiset]. Is it really worthwhile when looking at deforestation from a perspective? People can always stand up and find another job. When these people destroyed the homes of millions of people, these animals had nowhere to go. It is harder for animals to find new homes. It takes generations to adapt to the new environment. When these workers lose their jobs, they can enter many environmental jobs. For example, they can monitor forests and wildlife, rather than deforestation and damage to natural habitats. Another alternative is to work for a paper recycling company. They can save trees by recycling waste paper instead of cutting down trees. Instead of destroying natural habitats, these workers work for a company that represents good things.
Fiset believes that when companies destroy forests, they can easily compensate for the loss of the forest [Fiset] by planting more trees in the old forest. When lumberjacks cut down trees, they cannot simply plant more trees and leave them there. In a forest, there are various types of forests that take hundreds of years to form a large area of forest that supports biodiversity and all the wildlife that inhabit it. Usually, when the forest is destroyed, the company only grows one or two trees to make up for their removal. Some animals require specific trees to live or raise a family. When humans plant only one tree, they may be difficult to adapt and cause extreme extinction. When natural habitats are destroyed, most animals are killed in the process or some of them escape. However, when the animals returned, their home disappeared completely. For example, many birds nest in different tree species that have been destroyed, and now have to raise their families in an open space, just asking the predator to eat the birds. This happens because they cannot quickly adapt to self-support in this new tree. When a species is extinct, it will not look back. Once they leave, they will disappear forever.
Her last claim was that destroying forests would help find more natural resources such as oil, gas and coal. The automotive industry is beginning a new revolution with more fuel-efficient and environmentally friendly cars. The United States is gradually moving away from natural, non-renewable resources. The impact of burning coal is a serious impact of global warming, and O-ZONE levels are significantly reduced, protecting the planet from harmful UV rays from the sun. Therefore, coal is not the main thing we should look for. There are many other ways of electricity. There are wind energy, solar energy, geothermal energy, hydropower and tidal energy. All of these energy sources do not require natural resources, and they are all renewable and have little damage to the planet. If deforestation continues along the path it is moving, more species will be reduced.
In the Amazon forest, there are thousands of different organizations. One study done by scientists is to document how thornless and harmless bees can adapt to deforestation. According to the article, these special bee species are not only important to the environment, but also important to humans economically and culturally. Many people say that bees are not important, but for people living in the Amazon and Amazon, bees are sacred. Some people even think that these stingless bees are pets. Stingless bees produce honey for a variety of different uses. People can obviously eat honey or use them in certain recipes, and they can use it to make Balché, an alcoholic beverage. Another benefit of these bees is the pollination of farmers' crops. If there are no bees, then there are no crops that can produce food that farmers need to sell.
In a study of these stingless bees, scientists went to various parts of the Amazon region affected by deforestation in Asia and collected bees to understand how they adapted to deforestation. As a result, they found seven different species of stingless bees, but only two of these species appeared to be unaffected by deforestation [McCoy and Mushinski]. This means that five species of stingless bees are easily extinct. This is just one example of how deforestation can destroy species.
Another example of an animal at risk due to deforestation is a ring-tailed lemur. These monkeys live in Madagascar, but due to the rapid expansion of the population in Madagascar, the company is deforesting and destroying the habitat of lemurs. Many scientists believe that lemurs are the cause of the health of the rainforest [Butler]. There are only about 50 species of lemurs left. Deforestation puts a lot of pressure on these lemurs living in Madagascar. Evidence shows that many different species are affected by deforestation from bees to monkeys.
Cleaning trees to build farms, cities and homes will only destroy natural habitats. These are just the main influences. Most people will see other effects of deforestation. An example of a secondary impact of deforestation is the purchase of pollutants from forests. When a company is cleaning up an acre of forest, they bring trucks to store harmful pollutants in wildlife. Researchers have discovered that thousands of harmful chemicals are introduced into the natural environment, destroying the neurological, immune, endocrine and reproductive cycles of animals that come into contact with these chemicals [Hose and Guillette 87]. This also has a major impact on endangered species, as they are difficult to reproduce when affected by these pollutants. This means that the number of endangered species will not rise and it will not make it difficult to endanger.
However, people can take some solutions to help prevent harmful products from entering the natural environment. One solution could be to look very closely at the toxins exposed to the environment. This will limit the extent to which the chemical will pollute the environment and reset the reproductive cycle to orbit. Another resolution may be to understand the chemicals that are assigned to these environments. Once people know how bad these chemicals are, they may stop using them. The final resolution is to create a model ecosystem, such as a rehabilitation facility, to help reform the endocrine system [Hose and Guillette 88-89].
Although deforestation has severely affected wildlife, there are still a few organizations trying to help some animals struggling in the wild. These organizations have created recovery plans for endangered animals. Scientists can measure the success rate of these facilities, and the success rate is usually high. It is easier to measure the success of a facility at a time [McCoy and Mushinski]. Deforestation may be destroying the lives of some animals, but when humans take steps to help the natural environment get closer to absolutely helping endangered species.
There are many examples of how deforestation can be beneficial, but many just look at what they can do for humans. Supporters want to destroy habitats to find natural resources that can and will destroy the planet. Global warming is prevalent, and deforestation only increases the fuel for fire. In addition, millions of animal houses were destroyed when destroying an acre of forest. When the homes of these animals living in the forests that are cleaned every day disappear, they have no protection for themselves and their descendants. This is a major issue for biodiversity. Thousands of species are extinct every day, greatly reducing the biodiversity of the planet. Deforestation has many benefits for humans, but it is a huge problem for the natural environment.
Source
from
Butler, Rhett A. "The lemur is the key to the health of the Madagascar rainforest." Mongabay. May 5, 2008.
from
Fiset, Nathalie. "The benefits of deforestation." Ezinearticles. April 30, 2009.
from
Hose, JE & Guillette, LJ "Defining the role of pollutants in the distribution of wild animals." Environmental health...
Orignal From: Wildlife and deforestation
No comments:
Post a Comment